Meaning of Apathy

Apathy involves slew either cosmos content with their current posture and the world around them, or being ignorant to those same surroundings. indifferent citizens of any landed estate stub cause the foundations of clubhouse to crumble because these multitude think everything is well on the surface, when in actuality, it is non. A society stand go from having economic success one day, to being in a depression or even revolution as a nab out of apathy. The way to combat apathy in society is for the authorities to domesticate plenty on what their policy-making system and its policies are.If people knew more virtu altogethery their politicos and their specific policies, they would want to get involved in changing society in order to benefit themselves. They would realize that whoever is elected to office, whichever it might be, affects their lives some(prenominal) indirectly and directly. As a result of the entire universe of discourse acquiring involved in the g eve rywherenmental system of his or her nation, society would be able to continually change so that it could maintain economic success, depression unemployment rates, and e fictional character.Change is necessary for a society to stay healthy, and as Goldstone express in his essay Revolution, Social and semipolitical change is non a problem. Social change is an ongoing in just close to societies A society that is stagnant often suffers from a social order that is as well as stable. Without change, a change society can non make progress or solve social problems such as poverty and extreme dissimilitude (Primis 181). If society does remain stagnant, then economic success can function to an apathetic population, and this can temper to repression, and eventually to revolution.The best way to analyse and analyze the apathy in society is to look at the suffrager turnout rates from year to year. By investigating ballot, one can turn back through percentages and numbers precisely how involved people are in politics. When the economy is doing well, as it is today in the United States, voting numbers usually decrease because people rifle apathetic, and they are less concern about changes that might affect them. Due to the fact that some people are ofttimes dampen off financially than they ever take a leak, they become less interested in politics and more interested in spending their well-earned money.It is when people begin to suffer economically that they become more involved with politics because they smell that a change in the position quo is necessary for them to escape whatever economic recession they are in. sometimes people get sick with all the lies and promises that come out of politicians mouths that they become apathetic towards voting. Rather than give one of these politicians who are hardly seen as the better of two evils a right to vote, they choose not to vote at all.Their frustration with their choices results in them fair apathetic and in his essay Toward A Theory of Revolution, Davies says that revolutions need both a period of rising expectations and a succeeding period in which on that point are frustrated qualities (Primis 205). Thus, a period of economic success, followed by the population being frustrated with its political figures, can ultimately lead to a collapse in society. This apathy then results in people sightly too content with their current status and they then ask fewer questions, and this can cause foundations to crumble.The cycle then continues, with apathy leading to ignorance, and this can result in people blindly following the status quo, earlier than examining the issues. Then, before these non-voting citizens bop it, at that place will be revolutionary imagels floating(a) about society. As long as the country continues to be economically successful, and the people view one candidate as too interchangeable to the opposition, then people will continue to be apathetic because they feel the choices are not really choices at all.Apathy not only results from contentment and frustration, but withal from ignorance. Democracy is something everyone learns as early as kindergarten. When the teacher asks if it will be kickball or dodge ball at recess, the majority usually wins. It is an easy lesson for a 5-year-old to learn, as is raising your slip by for what you want. However, one of the most simple and necessary elements of a re world is the belief on active participation in the government by a majority of the population. If the participants are not influenced to be active, the system fails.By educating students and the usual about the value of the system, the education system could help combat apathy. The usage that college graduates are looked upon with more respect than the less educated has ended. How can the questionable higher educated members of society gain any respect when most graduates are unable or unwilling to participate in a ritual of our nati on? The problem is that traditional education, that included more intensifier study of government, has been replaced by a system that increasingly focuses on engine room and skills training but whitethorn be failing in educating full(a) citizens.A higher education should be more than job formulation it should be a continuing desire to improve and guarantee the quality of life for coevalss to come. With a lack of knowledge in politics and democracy comes the myth that one vote does not make a difference. some unsalted adults acquit no faith in the system, therefore they do not vote due to the feeling of disappointment that their vote does not matter. How often do you hear young adults say, I did not vote because I dont feel as if my vote would count. Others are disenchanted with the political system because voting in the past never produced results.However, young people today need to realize that one voice does make a difference. In addition, if more young adults took an in terest, politicians would be forced to listen. For example, financial financial aid is one of many issues at hand in recent political campaigns. If politicians continue to cut student aid, some young people may not have a chance for a college education. Thus, young adults essentialiness have faith in the system and increase the number of young voters. Otherwise, politicians will continue to cater only to the involve of the older generation that is voting them into office.The two largest voting publics in the United States are precedential citizens and the college aged groups (Gherry 328). Ironically, it is the senior citizens who are the more politically informed, and who vote in the greatest numbers. These statistics support the contention that the youth of America are becoming less informed about the process and necessity of voting, and are also more apathetic about the true significance of voting. As Americans, we must do something about voter apathy because not only does vo ting allow us to be active in the political process, it enables us to fulfill our civic duty and exert our political influence.Contrary to public opinion, every vote makes a difference in this process and it may not seem like it, but if more people began to vote, they would unimpeachably get noticed. Ironically, the last presidential election should have supported the idea of voter significance, yet served to create more apathy because of the post-election mess that occurred. many a(prenominal) people now feel the popular vote did not manage supreme, and that the voting system itself was shown to have more problems than was previously thought. To let our representatives know what we want, we must also exert our political influence by being politically active. How can we do this?We can vote in state, local, and subject field elections, lobby to persuade our representatives to vote a certain way, and write earn to our representatives about policy issues. Of course, there are opp osite ways of being politically active to me, these are the most effective. One thing needs to take place, and that is educational awareness of the political system and its impact, pure and simple. A good way to start getting votes out would be to have the majority rules method of voting. If you could just see that your vote made a difference in the election of the president of your nation, it would make you want to vote again.If the nation would listen to the educated people of the country instead of sense of hearing to the media, then the nation would be a whole lot better in terms of economics, welfare, war, and our society in general. In my opinion, we the people of this nation do not care about these campaigns that are putting the other candidates down, we just want to hear the good things about what they can do to better our nation. There is not anything that Americans hate more than liars and back stabbers. By getting the vote out, we voice our opinions on important issues.B y dynamic in the political process, we fulfill our civic duty. By exerting our political power, we impart into being our government policies. The best way to get involved in our political process is to vote, so people have to get out there, get registered, and go vote in the next election. Voter apathy has lead to a dangerous situation in American politics. People have not listened to the issues and have therefore been left with candidates who seem to be all the same, only with different magniloquence and different levels of charisma.Most people when questioned about their vote related that they were more against Gore and the Clinton administration than they were for Bush, and the reasons were more over moral appearance than policy making. The simple fact that during the past intravenous feeding years the country has experienced unprecedented economic growth, yet the incumbent administration was narrowly voted out, signals a public more concerned with the behavior of its leader s in the bedroom than their political policies.Bush represents the status-quo as much as Gore does, and the recent election really only revealed a public split between two candidates whose only difference seemed to be that one was aligned with his predecessor who had fallen from public moral grace. In order to have more clear-cut choices in candidates and over issues, there must be a movement in the United States to bring political education back into the classroom. An uninformed, politically uneducated public is a dangerous one because that public easily becomes apathetic.Yet, it is the public that has allowed candidates steeped in rhetoric rather than issues to continue to hold office. This cycle is one that needs to be broken, and it is not going to be broken by those currently in office because they naturally want to keep the status quo going. It is the future voters, and voters from ages 18 to 30 who must start taking an active interest in our political system, become aware of the issues and the process, and care enough to see that voting intelligently can and will make a difference in our countrys future.